In recent decades, number codes have appeared in the family of mantras. Opinions about their usefulness vary, just as the authors and energetic backgrounds of these codes vary. For example, we encounter angelic number codes, Grabovoi codes, the healing code of Zhi Cheng Guo, Energy Balancing by Numbers by Lloyd Mear, and others. Chaldean numerology also includes numerical codes, such as the code for activating harmonious energy in name numbers, which I presented a few months ago. There is also a number code derived from the date of birth, introduced by the Chaldean numerologist Alberto Ferrarese.
The code I am offering you for the New Year 2026 is not related to any of the above. It originates from one of my older codes, which I tested with acquaintances as early as 2017. Its numerological foundation is too complex to go into here, as it operates on nine levels and in some places also takes into account the cubing of numbers. The numbers are mentally spoken in the order in which they appear in the code.
The code is:
127954863
Its function is to activate, harmonize, and release the natural circulation of energy in the meridians of the subtle body, and to strengthen this circulation with environmental energy in order to achieve harmonious development. This is not a magic wand, but a tool with limited reach. This numerical mantra must not be repeated continuously without interruption, as doing so destroys its internal structure. Any error in the sequence of numbers also destroys the internal structure. Over time, the structure is likewise destroyed by writing the code down—for example on paper or on one’s own skin—because the digits may begin to add up into a single number (“fadic number,” “vibratory key”).
Mentally focus on the number 1, then on 2, then on 7, and so on until the final number 3. Then interrupt your concentration for at least 10 seconds and relax. The code can be repeated several times in this way.
Happy New Year!
Boštjan
The Mystery of Numbers, Luck, Worlds and Planets 
In his later work, Isidore Kozminsky associated the letter S with 6 instead of 3, but why should we assume the value of 3 for S? The letter S confuses me the most, so could you please resolve this dilemma for me, sir?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, Sushant. The numerological values of letters may derive either from the sound associated with a letter or from the shape of the letter, which is tied to an original sound. I come from Europe, for example, and the typical European S sound, according to phonetic coding, is associated not with the Semitic letter shin (values 300, 21, 3) but rather with the Semitic letter samekh (values 60, 15, 6). However, the Latin letter S developed from the letter shin, or sigma, and the shape of this letter contains the code 300, 21, and 3.
In the Latin alphabet, there are also several more controversial letters. The letter H, for example, represents a soft or even silent sound in much of Europe, and from at least the 16th century onward it can be associated with the Semitic letter he (value 5). Formally, however, it derives from the letter ḥet (value 8). In the past, a shift occurred here from the original phonetic–numerical code of the letter (8) to the code of its later association with a softer sound (5). Similarly, the letter F developed from the code of the letter waw but transitioned from the value 6 to the phonetic value 80, 17, 8.
Why such a shift has not (yet) occurred with the letter S is unknown. Analyses of examples indicate that, even at the beginning of the 21st century, the letter S retains the value characteristic of shin. In an unspecified future, it is reasonable to expect that the letter S will change its numerical code.
LikeLiked by 1 person