In Chaldean numerology, as in many other systems that deal with understanding pf human destiny, there are a variety of approaches among practitioners, some of which may even conflict with one another. A similar situation can be seen in Western astrology, where practitioners might use different house systems, such as equal houses based on the ascendant or the Placidus system, among others. Some interpret retrograde planetary motion traditionally, viewing it as a period of negative influence, while others see it as an opportunity for introspection. Similarly, planetary aspects might be analyzed through the lens of traditional texts, or alternatively, with insights from modern psychology.
So, where do we find the biggest differences in Chaldean numerology?
Some numerologists prioritize the favourable or unfavourable relationships between numbers over the intrinsic nature of a number itself. For instance, a generally “lucky” number might behave “unluckily” due to its interactions with other numbers. Others argue that, in most cases, a number retains its inherent “lucky” or “unlucky” qualities, but the intensity of those qualities may be amplified or diminished depending on its relationships with other numbers.
Cheiro, one of the most influential Chaldean numerologists, relied on ancient traditions when interpreting number relationships. However, numerologists who preceded him often did not assign much importance to these relationships. Others, meanwhile, place significant emphasis on planetary friendships, defining numerical relationships based on this criterion. Since Chaldean numerology has spread widely in India, it’s worth noting that jyotish (Vedic astrology) interprets planetary friendships differently than Western astrology. Applying these differing approaches to numbers naturally leads to divergent conclusions.
Many Chaldean numerologists use Cheiro’s system of alphanumeric coding, but some adhere to alternative methods, such as the traditional external (Cavendish) or internal approaches (Gibson, Johari).
In classical numerology, names or surnames with values below 10 were generally considered acceptable. Cheiro, however, sometimes added the single-digit value of a birthdate to a name or surname with a reduced total below 10 (in order to derive a key number for analysis). The Danish school applies a similar approach but does so for all names and surnames under the value of 10.
There is also considerable variation in how the Total Name Number is calculated. Some sum the base numbers of the name and surname, while others use compound numbers, or they combine the base digit of the name with the base digit of the surname.
Some Chaldean numerologists, such as Cheiro, never use the Life Path Number—the total sum of the birthdate (day, month, and year). Others, however, consider this number to be a crucial element in their analysis.
Another key difference among Chaldean numerologists lies in whether they conduct a specific analysis for vowels and consonants in addition to the general analysis. Some also include supplementary evaluations, such as analyses of initials, the influence of numbers on chakras, and similar methods.
There are even more variations in approach beyond those described here. Naturally, some methods yield better results than others. As for which system I use, some insights can be found in my published analyses.
I wish you much success as you explore the fascinating world of Chaldean numerology. 😊
The Mystery of Numbers, Luck, Worlds and Planets 